[header2.html]



[side_nav2.html]

 


cii-usa newsletter

July 2006 Newsletter

Let’s Play Down Volume; Play Up Profits

Last month, I spoke at the annual Trans-Pacific Air Cargo Conference held in Los Angeles. My message was simple; let’s play down volume and play up profits. What I called “profitless prosperity” in the U.S.-Asian air freight market will endure unless two conditions are met. We must (a) increase our rates and (b) generate more two way traffic to balance the current predominantly eastbound traffic.

'"profitless prosperity' in the U.S.-Asian air freight market will endure unless two conditions are met. We must (a) increase our rates and (b) generate more two way traffic to balance the current predominantly eastbound traffic."

I urged the audience of forwarders, shippers, airline executives and consultants to “bite the bullet” and raise rates. We offer a premium service and should charge premium prices. I likened air cargo to the “timid giant” in children’s stories who doesn’t know his own strength. I stated in the most forceful terms that the disgraceful policy by the airlines of charging little or nothing for carriage across the Pacific and making money only on security fees and fuel surcharges must stop.

Moving cargo by air has become an essential ingredient in the logistics policies of thousands of companies, as I reminded the audience. We provide a service that to many shippers means the difference between profit and loss, increased or lessened market share or even acceptance or rejection of a company product. We should charge rates commensurate with the enormous value of our services.

The sponsors of the Conference also asked me to discuss future opportunities in Asian air freight “beyond China.” I stressed the importance of India becoming a significant second to China as a generator of air cargo volume in the years ahead. I believe India will advance rapidly as that nation is the largest democracy in the world. Democracy always will trump dictatorship, I declared. I pointed to the airline industry in India. Under state sponsorship, there were only two airlines serving the vast subcontinent. Both lost money. Today, there are nine privately owned carriers with most making money and providing excellent passenger and cargo services.

While India has a great potential as a fountainhead of air freight, it is not without serious problems. Corruption remains rife, inland transportation is in shambles with only the railroads as dependable carriers of goods (interestingly, they were built more than a hundred years ago by the British to ferry troops around that vast nation) and private equity is scarce.

I concluded my remarks by urging the audience to look “beyond Asia” to other parts of the world as potential opportunities for air cargo. I particularly pointed to eastern Europe where capitalism still remains in the formative stage and rate of growth is far greater than at our traditional European partners like France, Germany, the U.K., etc.

"I stressed the importance of India becoming a significant second to China as a generator of air cargo volume in the years ahead. I believe India will advance rapidly as that nation is the largest democracy in the world. Democracy always will trump dictatorship"

Back to Top

  Qantas Continuing To Reduce Work Force

With CII wholesale operations to Australia still a major part of our business, we naturally are concerned with the fortunes of Aussie’s flag carrier, Qantas. Unfortunately, the airline continues to make “redundant” scores of its trained, experienced personnel. The latest slash in payroll is the axing of 1,000 administrative and management positions worldwide, including veteran air cargo personnel. This latest effort in cost cutting comes on the heels of dismissing more than 1,000 mechanics and engineers and closing its heavy maintenance operations in Sydney. Much of Qantas heavy duty maintenance now is being “outsourced” to cheaper companies in Asia. Will these “outsourced” workers have the same standards, the same dedication to their companies as Qantas employees did for their own airline? I doubt it very much.

When will the airlines stop cutting off their noses to spite their faces? United Air Lines, which is enjoying a boom in passenger and cargo traffic, plans to lay off 1,000 additional employees—this after shrinking its work force 50 per cent since declaring bankruptcy four years ago.

"Reducing work forces, outsourcing complicated procedures to vendors who may not have the experience and skills required to maintain modern jet aircraft is not the path airlines should trod."

Enough of down sizing. Airlines have hacked and hacked until bare bones are showing. An airline is not a department store where it doesn’t really matter if a few more or less sales people are on the floor. An airline is a highly technical, quite complicated organization where people and equipment must mesh seamlessly. Reducing work forces, outsourcing complicated procedures to vendors who may not have the experience and skills required to maintain modern jet aircraft is not the path airlines should trod.

Back to Top

Con-Way Shuts Down Forwarding Operation; Emery Name Disappears Forever

The big LTL trucking company, Con-Way, has shut down its domestic forwarding operation, which it purchased in 1989 for $230 million. Not only did Con-Way take a huge loss on the transaction, it wrote finis to one of the most historic names in air cargo, Emery Air Freight. To younger members of our business, Emery barely exists in their consciousness. But to veterans in our industry, Emery was the dominant company in air freight for more than 30 years.

It was John Emery, Sr., who after World War II, started Emery Air Freight and the modern air cargo industry was born. A naval supply officer during the war, Emery believed that companies would pay, and pay well, for rapid, dependable delivery of “must get through” shipments. He was proven correct and Emery quickly became one of the fastest growing companies in U.S. industry. It was part of the “nifty fifty” group of corporations on the New York Stock Exchange whose growth was considered unlimited. Because of Emery’s success, other companies entered the air freight game like Airborne and Burlington Northern Air Freight. A new industry became part of the transportation landscape.

Alas, nothing lasts forever. Emery became a pawn in big company juggling of acquisitions and de-acquisitions. And if truth be told, John Emery’s successors were less than brilliant in running the company. But we will miss the name, which at one time was synonymous with the phrase, “air freight.”

Back to Top

 

  Airlines Talk Rates; Exporters Talk Service

When U.S. exporters get together to compare notes on shipping by air, they rarely mention rates. The discussions usually are dominated by service problems. Service is especially crucial for air shipments to Asia where exporters face continuing problems on the Asian continent with equipment shortages, insufficient trucking capacity and miserable surface conditions beyond the very largest cities.

Airlines, forwarders and their customers are on a collision course. Shippers want greater service. The airlines claim, with continued high fuel costs and funds needed to purchase expensive new aircraft, improved service takes money and money is tight. Shippers claim they require heightened standards of service to to remain competitive in the global marketplace. Forwarders are caught in the middle. The difficulty is that over capacity on U.S.-Asian trade routes are keeping rates low, particularly westbound traffic. Something like 2 million pounds of cargo capacity is available weekly between the United States and Asian destinations.

More is coming. Almost weekly, new cargo airlines primarily based in Asia and with huge 747 capacity, is announced.

Though overshadowed by east bound traffic, U.S. exports to Asia hardly are insignificant. Some $60 billion worth of U.S. goods were exported by air to Asia, primarily China, in 2005 with greater volume expected this year. Service is compromised because exporters share the same facilities and trucking pools as the much larger importers, often causing major traffic jams at airport cargo facilities. Shippers are starting to become restive.

Airlines and forwarders who do not address these problems risk losing business. In a recent survey of air cargo shippers, ninety per cent said they simply would not continue doing business with their present vendors if service does not improve. Fair warning to our industry.

Back to Top
 

Interstate Highway System Celebrates 50 Years

Fifty years ago, in June, 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the Federal-Aid Highway Act—the law creating the nation’s Interstate Highway system. This law which eventually resulted in the construction of 46,000 miles of interstate highways, changed the face of the United States and prompted a revolution in the way Americans live and work. The highway system, stretching from the East and West coasts and from the Canadian to the Mexican borders, connected manufacturing centers, sea and airports, urban and suburban markets. It transformed the trucking industry and to a lesser extent the air freight business.

Before the network of expressways, freeways and parkways was constructed, most of America was connected by narrow, two lane highways like the famous Route 66. Traveling by car or truck was slow and cumbersome. The trucking industry then was dominated on both management and labor sides by ‘dese, ‘dem and ‘dose guys who were far more comfortable brawling in a bar than looking at a balance sheet. To deliver freight by truck between two cities just a few hundred miles apart took a week.

Air freight initially benefited by the maze of new highways. About 90 per cent of an air freight’s shipment time is spent on the ground. Faster ground transportation meant more rapid delivery of “air” cargo.

Companies like Forward Air, Landair and Towne sprung up to deliver cargo by truck between airports. As technology became more advanced, truckers began scheduling their routes with greater precision and efficiency. Trucking, which traditionally had been a business dominated by small, family owned trucking companies or individual owner-drivers, began to coalesce into larger units.

Today, our big, beautiful highways crisscrossing the nation, combined with modern technology, has made the trucking industry into a powerful competitor to domestic air freight. Whereas fifty years ago, a truck would take a week to deliver shipments to a city in the same state, today it can move freight across the U.S. continent in even less time. Little wonder that domestic air cargo volume is declining while LTL truck deliveries are going through the roof. The law of unintended consequences has again come into play. Who would have thought when the Highway Act was signed by President Eisenhower fifty years ago, that it would have such an impact on the air cargo industry half a century later?

Back to Top

  FedEx May Be Wall Street’s Darling But Its Profitability Trails UPS

Late last month, FedEx released fourth quarter results and Wall Street rewarded the higher numbers with a 5% increase in the price of its stock.

Fred Smith knows where his bread is buttered. He truly has become the darling of Wall Street as well as one of Washington’s biggest spending lobbyists. Fred spends more time on K Street, home base to the capital’s lobbying industry, than he does in Memphis. Every time Wall Street has given a little reengineering advice here and suggested some consulting services there, Fred has danced to their tunes and coughed up.

The exact opposite is the case with UPS, who just goes about its business of moving packages with speed and efficiency and doesn’t have high powered help either on Wall or K Streets. Result, its shares have languished within a $20.00 range from its 2001 IPO price. FedEx announced a 27 per cent surge in quarterly profits to $568 million. The irony is that domestic air shipments, which was the original reason for the company’s existence, is languishing. Between the third and fourth quarters of 2006, domestic air shipments dropped by more than 5%. Its trucking operations, on the other hand, is going like gangbusters with a rise of almost 9 per cent. FedEx is going deeper into trucking with the purchase of Watkins Motor Lines for $780 million. Like other cargo airlines serving the domestic market, including Kitty Hawk and BAX Global, FedEx busily is de-emphasizing delivery by air and expanding its ground services.

The perception of FedEx to the shipping public is that the company represents overnight delivery of packages. The reality is far different, however. Despite the company’s attempt to sell the sizzle of its overnight package business, the real driving force behind FedEx today is its domestic surface and international air operations. While Wall Street applauds FedEx profit growth, it seems unaware or wishes to ignore the fact that the company’s rate of profit is far less than that of Microsoft and its rival, UPS. FedEx revenues now exceed $33 billion and its net profits are $2 billion. Microsoft earned $12 billion on less revenue and plain old UPS has far superior earnings to FedEx. Fred Smith knows the value of kissing up to Wall Street and Washington.

Back to Top
 

Julian Keeling

 


Newsletter Signup
First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Email:

[footer2.html]