|
|


May 2005 Newsletter
Are We Becoming A Service Economy?
Defenders
of the growing number of U.S. manufacturers
outsourcing their operations overseas claim
everyone will benefit from moving jobs abroad.
“Globalization” is the mantra of those who
advocate unrestricted free markets. They
assert that eventually, the U.S. will profit
with the expansion of better paying jobs that
call for greater skills and higher education.
While we’re waiting for this millennium, the
U.S. is becoming a service economy to an even
greater degree than ever before. Walk into any
Wal-Mart store and almost 90 per cent of the
goods on the shelves are foreign made. Adding
to this witches’ brew is the explosive growth
of consumer and business credit, now reaching
the astronomical sum of $5 trillion.
Credit and finance are the fastest growing
sectors of the economy. Twenty years ago,
financial companies accounted for only 4% of
all corporate earnings. Today, they account
for 40%. Back in the seventies, financial
companies accounted for just 5% of all stock
market capitalization. Today, they represent
25% of total market value. It seems that more
and more Americans are making a living selling
credit to each other. Manufacturing companies
like GM who once towered like Colossus over
American industrial empires, now face the
ignominy of having their bonds reduced to
almost junk status.
There is little question the U.S. financial
system is dangerously stretched and
vulnerable. The Federal Reserve’s ability to
contain a serious break in any part of our
highly connected financial system has become
very limited. The mantle of growth has passed
to the Continent of Asia. The great expansion
years of the U.S., Europe and Japan are over.
Can we continue our proliferate ways
permanently? Can we run up $500 billion trade
deficits forever? The U.S. has been living
under a lucky star for many years. I expect
that star will be dimming in the not too
distant future.
Back to Top
| |
Will Panalpina Resume It's Growth
With Beatson Out?
The
overhaul was abrupt. The announcement was
brief. The high brass at Panalpina’s Swiss
headquarters decided that David Beatson,
head of North American operations for the
freight forwarder, had to go. Panalpina’s
CEO, Bruno Sidler, obviously had no wish to
repeat the mistakes of Emery and Circle Air
Freight who allowed Beatson, when he was
their top man, to run those companies into
the ground. In addition to his crude “take
no prisoners” managerial style which was
bitterly resented by the Panalpina staff,
Beatson began implementing extravagant and
costly sales and marketing programs which
disconcerted and shocked Panalpina’s
conservative executives back in Switzerland.
Perhaps equally as important as the ouster
of Beatson himself was the removal at the same
time of four of his cronies who aped his chaotic
methods of management. They included Gary
Dittman, exec VP of sales & marketing, Doug
Brittin, VP of sales, Bruce Spear, VP of
business development and David Burnell, VP of
domestic service.
Now that Sidler has cleaned house, he faces the
tough task of rebuilding the company’s key North
American operations and restoring morale in a
shaken work force. He’s made a good start in
elevating Hans-Peter Merath, a 42-year veteran
at Panalpina, to head North American operations
and Daniel Trafzer to oversee finances at the
Foster City, CA headquarters. These management
changes come at a critical time in Panalpina’s
long history as a freight forwarder. The company
is preparing for an initial public offering on
the Swiss Stock Exchange. It is trying to
respond to the rapid expansion and fierce
competition of companies like Exel, DHL, Danzas,
Kuehne & Nagle who have outpaced Panalpina’s
growth in recent years.
It will be interesting to follow Panalpina’s
progress under its new management. It also will
be interesting to watch the fate of Beatson
after his abrupt departure from Panalpina. Will
another cargo organization ignore his “damaged
goods” and hire him? Stay tuned.
Back to Top
|
Contradictory Signals On China Trade:
There
are mixed signals coming out of China. Most
indicators still reflect continued growth this
year in trade volume between China and the
U.S. But there are a few troubling signs that
slowdowns may be occurring in that “factory to
the world.” U.S. cargo airlines are spending
millions of dollars to expand their operations
in China. UPS is launching new service between
the U.S. and Guangzho, the big industrial city
in China’s southeast, with six daily flights.
FedEx is considering establishing a new hub in
that city. Polar now flies nine flights per
week into Shanghai. But are these airlines
chasing elusive pots of gold?
" ...the last month in which figures are
available, the deficit in shipped goods to
China reached almost $14 billion."
Other airlines are watching nervously as once
full aircraft now fly out of China with space
to spare. Lufthansa is reporting a small but
worrying drop in China traffic. And airline
execs are beginning to take seriously the huge
imbalance between load factors in ex-China and
ex-U.S. flights. How will they cope with this
very weak backlog? In February, the last month
in which figures are available, the deficit in
shipped goods to China reached almost $14
billion. The $14 billion amount is hardly
pocket change. This deficit cannot continue
while at the same time airlines are ramping up
cargo service. Something’s got to give. That
something inevitably will be rates. Air cargo
is not a commodity business. We don’t move raw
steel or barrels of oil. We fly generally high
value manufactured and semi- manufactured
products that require rapid, precise delivery
schedules. With all this outsourcing, the U.S.
is becoming less and less a manufacturing
bastion. Perhaps to alleviate this imbalance
of trade, we should ship, as cargo, the
thousands of consultants and 3PL executives
who now clutter up the air cargo landscape.
Back to Top
| |
South
Pacific Airlines Showing Good Growth:
The two major flag airlines serving the South
Pacific; Qantas and Air New Zealand, have
reported solid operational and financial
results for the six months ended December 31,
2004. All indications point to those gains
continuing into 2005.
Improvement
at Qantas was particularly strong with
revenues up 11% to $6.4 billion (Australian)
with profits rising 28% to $484 million
(Australian). At both airlines, cargo traffic
is providing a solid underpinning to passenger
revenues. Of course, these increases reflect
the currently strong economies of both
countries. While far less publicized than the
Chinese “miracle,” the South Pacific is
enjoying its own quiet boom.
Fueled by the declining value of the U.S.
dollar, the U.S.-Australian Free Trade
Agreement taking effect last January and the
greatest growth in GNP of any developed
nations, Australia and New Zealand (at least
currently) present two bright spots in a very
mixed international air freight picture.
"Now that Sidler has cleaned house, he
faces the tough task of rebuilding the
company’s key North American operations and
restoring morale in a shaken work force."
There is an interesting sidelight to the
overall South Pacific airline scene. Virgin
Blue, which started with such fanfare a few
years ago to serve the Australian domestic
market after the demise of longtime carrier
Ansett, is finding it easier to talk the talk
than walk the walk. Qantas’ domestic carrier,
Jetstar, is eating Virgin Blue’s lunch with a
rapidly growing share of the market. Virgin
Blue’s Board foolishly rejected Patrick
Corporation’s bid of $1.1 billion (Australian)
to control 100 per cent of that airline as
“inadequate.” Virgin Blue will be lucky to get
half that amount next year as its share of the
market keeps dropping. Adding to the airline’s
troubles was the abrupt resignation of
co-founder and Deputy COO Robert Sherrard who
left to “pursue other interests.” Smart man to
step aside from the Virgin Blue mess while
there was still time.
Back to Top
|
Domestic Air
Freight Losing Out To Trucks:
While CII as an international freight
wholesaler is not directly involved in
domestic air cargo, we are naturally
concerned with the health, or lack of it, of
our entire industry. And the health of the
domestic air cargo business is not good.
Within U.S. borders, the world’s largest
single market for air freight, the truck is
the winner and the airplane is the loser.
Shippers, freight forwarders, airlines and
trucking companies; all are being pulled in
a jet stream heading straight down to the
highways of our nation.
What
began a decade ago as an effort by shippers
to cut costs, has evolved into a huge
business for LTL truckers. They always have
offered lower rates. Now, they have combined
these far cheaper tariffs with excellent
service. In fact, the LTL market has become
so efficient, it has negated the need for
two day or deferred air freight for just
about every section of the U.S.. Air has a
clear advantage only for trans-con traffic
and even that is being eroded by express
trucks. Many shippers simply will not pay
air’s double rates just to save a day.
The decline in moving domestic cargo by air
is occurring with all kinds of cargo and
across all weight breaks. While FedEx’
domestic ground operations are expanding at
an almost exponential pace, its air express
volume is decreasing. Ditto for UPS. They
had disappointing financial results in their
next to last quarter although the company’s
most recent quarter did improve. The
disappointing results were the direct result
of lack of growth in the overnight domestic
package business. Kitty Hawk and BAX Global,
the two major domestic cargo airlines for
heavyweight freight, are quietly expanding
their surface operations. Even when shippers
and their forwarder agents are willing to
pay a higher price for air, they are finding
less options. The financially strapped
airlines are eliminating frequencies and
substituting smaller aircraft on domestic
routes. These narrow bodied airplanes simply
can’t handle heavyweight and/or odd-shaped
cargo that the wide bodies could in the
past.
The growing reliance by shippers for
expedited, dedicated LTL ground service is
such a sweeping, profound trend, it will be
tough to reverse. How can air freight
compete with surface rates that start at 15
cents per pound? Currently, international
forwarders are benefiting as both passenger
and cargo airlines are scheduling more
non-stop flights overseas, particularly to
the Asian Continent. In our fast changing
industry, however, nothing is permanent.
Back to Top
| |
Whatever
Happened To The Economic Recovery?
President
Bush is facing a political dilemma that has
bedeviled Presidents throughout U.S.
history—the second term jinx. FDR’s second
term was disastrous after his failed attempt
to “pack” the U.S. Supreme Court. Nixon’s
second four years ended in Watergate and
disgrace. The current “soft patch” in the U.S.
economy which shows every indication of
widening, may well be President Bush’s
Achilles heel. All indications point to a
weakening U.S. economy. Housing starts dropped
almost 20 percent in March. The growth in jobs
has been persistently anemic. Our trade
deficit continues to balloon with higher
negative numbers being recorded each month.
Perhaps our most important and often most
accurate
Only corporate profits continue to put on
weight. But corporations have not flexed their
muscles. They are not using the gusher of
earnings to expand plant and equipment or to
generate new jobs. Rather, they are holding
onto their cash like the most fervent misers.
Corporate cash is at record levels. Exxon
Mobil has a tidy $27 billion tucked away. IBM
has more than $5 billion. United Technologies
with $3 billion. CEOs, once kings of the
jungle, have become pussy cats.
"Unless and until companies lose their
timidity and begin expanding production; start
hiring seriously again—our economic :recovery”
will go nowhere."
Unless and until companies lose their timidity
and begin expanding production; start hiring
seriously again— our economic :recovery” will
go nowhere. As a nation, the U.S. is consuming
and investing in various financial instruments
6 per cent more than we are producing. That 6
percent shortfall is made up by money imported
from abroad—some $2 billion a day. In the
process, we’re absorbing a mind-boggling 80
per cent of the world’s net flow of capital.
Obviously, this imbalance can’t go on forever.
How much longer will the central banks of
China and Japan accept our paper in return for
their nations sending to us automobiles,
computers, TV sets, toys, apparel and hundreds
of other kinds of real products? If this
“recovery” turns into a recession, Bush will
continue the second term tradition of a failed
presidency.
Sincerely,
Julian A. Keeling
Back to Top
|
|
|